Expulsion of a Shareholder in Two-Shareholder Limited Liability Companies Considering the Constitutional Court’s Recent Decision
Introduction
The emergence of disputes between shareholders in limited liability companies and the inability to resolve such disputes may directly affect the company’s operations, particularly in structures consisting of only two shareholders. Indeed, in two-shareholder limited liability companies, disputes between shareholders may easily render the company’s management and decision-making mechanisms dysfunctional.
Under the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”), various mechanisms have been introduced regarding the expulsion of shareholders from limited liability companies to ensure the continuity of the company’s operations despite potential disputes between shareholders. Nevertheless, the applicability of these mechanisms in two-shareholder companies has long been subject to debate. In particular, the quorum requirement applicable to the general assembly resolution required for filing an expulsion lawsuit may render the expulsion mechanism practically inoperable in two-shareholder companies, even where just cause exists.
In its decision dated 25.12.2025 and numbered 2025/128 File., 2025/273 K. (“Decision”), the Constitutional Court (“Court”) addressed the above-mentioned issue concerning the inability to operate the shareholder expulsion mechanism in two-shareholder limited liability companies from a constitutional perspective, examined the applicability of the current system, and ultimately annulled Articles 616/1-h and 621/1-h of the TCC, which require a general assembly resolution for the expulsion of a shareholder, insofar as they apply to two-shareholder limited liability companies. The Decision is particularly noteworthy in terms of the State’s positive obligations under the freedom of enterprise (Article 48 of the Constitution) and the right to an effective remedy (Article 40 of the Constitution), as well as its approach to the “deadlock” problem frequently discussed in practice.
Mechanism for the Expulsion of Shareholders in Limited Liability Companies
Under the system adopted by the TCC, the expulsion of a shareholder from a limited liability company may essentially occur either through a general assembly resolution adopted upon the existence of grounds explicitly stipulated in the articles of association, or through a court decision rendered upon the company’s request based on just cause.
Expulsion by court decision is regulated under Article 640/3 of the TCC. However, to initiate such proceedings, Article 616/1-h of the TCC requires the adoption of a general assembly resolution. Pursuant to Article 621/1-h of the TCC, such resolution must be adopted by at least two-thirds of the represented votes and by the absolute majority of the share capital carrying voting rights.
The purpose of these provisions is to prevent the arbitrary expulsion of minority shareholders by the majority and to subject shareholder expulsion, which leads to severe legal consequences, to strict procedural safeguards.
The Problem Arising in Two-Shareholder Limited Liability Companies
In practice, the procedural requirements introduced under Articles 616/1-h and 621/1-h of the TCC frequently render the shareholder expulsion mechanism entirely dysfunctional in two-shareholder limited liability companies. Indeed, these procedural requirements effectively lead to a de facto unanimity requirement for the adoption of the relevant general assembly resolution.
However, it is naturally expected that the shareholder whose expulsion is sought would not approve such a resolution. As a result, the general assembly resolution required for the company to apply to court cannot be adopted, the expulsion lawsuit cannot be filed on behalf of the company, and consequently, disputes may remain unresolved even where just cause exists.
This issue becomes particularly apparent where the relationship of trust between shareholders has completely broken down, where the company’s management becomes dysfunctional, or where one shareholder intentionally obstructs the company’s operations. In practice, this situation is commonly referred to as a “deadlock” and results in the paralysis of the company’s decision-making mechanisms.
Indeed, in practice, expulsion lawsuits have frequently been dismissed on procedural grounds due to the absence of the required general assembly resolution, forcing shareholders to resort to more severe remedies such as dissolution of the company or withdrawal from the company. Such situations may ultimately jeopardize the continuity of the company’s operations.
Application Before the Constitutional Court
In the case subject to the Decision, the relevant provisions of TCC came under scrutiny in a lawsuit filed by one shareholder of a two-shareholder limited liability company seeking the expulsion of the other shareholder.
The Bakırköy 1st Commercial Court of First Instance (“Court of First Instance”), hearing the dispute, determined that under the current provisions of the TCC, the necessary general assembly resolution could not be adopted and therefore the procedural precondition for filing the lawsuit had not been fulfilled. Subsequently, the Court of First Instance applied to the Constitutional Court, arguing that Articles 616/1-h and 621/1-h of the TCC were unconstitutional, particularly with respect to two-shareholder limited liability companies.
The application specifically emphasized the practical impossibility of adopting the required general assembly resolution, the inability to file a lawsuit even where just cause exists, the deadlock in the company’s operations, and the protection afforded by the system to a shareholder acting in bad faith. It was argued that Articles 616/1-h and 621/1-h of the TCC violated Articles 2, 10, 35, 36, and 74 of the Constitution.
Constitutional Court’s Assessment
The Constitutional Court conducted its assessment specifically with respect to two-shareholder limited liability companies and determined that the contested provisions primarily needed to be evaluated under Article 40 of the Constitution (right to an effective remedy) and Article 48 of the Constitution (freedom of enterprise).
In this regard, the Court first stated that the right granted under Article 640/3 of the TCC to request the expulsion of another shareholder from the court based on just cause constitutes a mechanism aimed at preventing the termination of the company’s legal existence and safeguarding the continuity of its commercial activities. Accordingly, the Court held that this mechanism falls within the scope of protection afforded by the freedom of enterprise under Article 48 of the Constitution.
The Constitutional Court further found that, in two-shareholder companies, the requirement to adopt a general assembly resolution effectively renders the filing of an expulsion lawsuit impossible even where just cause exists. Although the Court acknowledged that the purpose of the relevant provisions was to prevent the majority from arbitrarily expelling minority shareholders, it emphasized that, in two-shareholder companies, the mechanism produces precisely the opposite result.
The Court also noted that this structure in two-shareholder limited liability companies jeopardizes the continuity of the company’s operations and enables one shareholder to systematically block the other shareholder. According to the Court, the inability to resolve disputes despite the existence of just cause affects not only the individual interests of the shareholders but also the company’s economic existence and commercial activities.
Finding that such a structure, where dispute resolution is prevented and company operations become unsustainable even where just cause exists, is incompatible with the State’s positive obligations under Article 40 of the Constitution, the Constitutional Court concluded that Articles 616/1-h and 621/1-h of the TCC were unconstitutional insofar as they apply to two-shareholder limited liability companies and annulled these provisions for such companies by majority vote, with six dissenting votes.
Effects of the Decision in Practice
The Decision directly addresses a significant practical issue that has long been debated in relation to two-shareholder limited liability companies. Under the previous system, the practical inoperability of the expulsion mechanism frequently pushed shareholders toward more severe outcomes such as dissolution of the company.
Following the Constitutional Court’s annulment decision, the requirement for a general assembly resolution in relation to the expulsion of a shareholder in two-shareholder limited liability companies has effectively ceased to apply. Nevertheless, it remains unclear how courts will approach expulsion lawsuits filed without a general assembly resolution and what procedural framework will be adopted in practice. Accordingly, new case law on this matter is expected to emerge in the near future.
Alternative Solutions and Contractual Mechanisms
While the Decision addresses the deadlock problem in two-shareholder limited liability companies from a constitutional perspective, it also highlights the importance of contractual mechanisms for preventing such disputes.
In particular, predetermining exit mechanisms within shareholders’ agreements or similar arrangements may significantly facilitate the resolution of future disputes. In this context, mechanisms granting the parties reciprocal buy-out or sell-out rights under certain conditions stand out as practical solutions where the shareholder relationship becomes unsustainable.
Accordingly, especially in two-shareholder limited liability companies, it is important not only to carefully structure the articles of association but also to comprehensively draft shareholders’ agreements.
Conclusion
The Constitutional Court’s Decision dated 25.12.2025 constitutes a significant turning point regarding the practical operation of the shareholder expulsion mechanism in two-shareholder limited liability companies. The Decision assessed the structural problem arising from the current system from a constitutional perspective and made important findings concerning the State’s positive obligations under the freedom of enterprise (Article 48 of the Constitution) and the right to an effective remedy (Article 40 of the Constitution).
Following the Constitutional Court’s annulment of Articles 616/1-h and 621/1-h of the TCC insofar as they apply to two-shareholder limited liability companies, it is expected that the current practice regarding shareholder expulsion will be significantly affected and that new judicial approaches in this field will emerge.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
With the proliferation of group of companies’ structures, the need to protect the trust placed in the reputation of the group has gained importance. Article 209 of the Turkish Commercial Code ("TCC") regulates the liability of the parent company arising from the trust created in third parties using the group's reputation…
A change in control within a publicly held company should not be regarded merely as a quantitative shift in shareholding structure; rather, it constitutes a qualitative transformation that has significant implications for minority shareholders’ property rights, investment…
This legal post examines the decision of the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation numbered E.2024/1865, K.2025/478 (“Decision”). The Decision is significant in terms of the rejection of transfers of registered shares in joint stock companies by the board of directors, the legal validity of such rejection…
Capital increase in privately held joint stock companies is an important transaction that allows the company to grow and meet its financing needs by strengthening its equity structure. A capital increase means an increase in the amount of the company's ordinary/registered capital and is realized with the...
Article 408, paragraph 2, subparagraph (f) of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") lists the "wholesale of a significant amount of company assets" among the unassignable and exclusive duties and powers of the general assembly. However, this provision does not clearly regulate what is meant by the...
To ensure economic stability in Turkiye and preservere the value of the Turkish Lira, an amendment was introduced to Decree No. 32 on the Protection of the Value of the Turkish Currency through Presidential Decree No. 85, published in the Official Gazette No. 30534, dated September 13, 2018. This regulation...
In the rapidly digitalizing world, e-commerce is spreading rapidly, strengthening the impact of sales made via the Internet and traditional channels. According to the Ministry of Trade data for 2023, Türkiye's e-commerce volume increased by 115.15% compared to the previous year, reaching 1.85 trillion Turkish liras...
In an extraordinary dissolution, ex officio cancellation from the trade registry without liquidation is regulated under the provisional Article 7 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”). Under Paragraph 15 of the relevant provision, the creditors of the company or cooperative, which was ex officio canceled...
As the global business landscape evolves, foreign companies increasingly seek to expand their presence in promising markets. Türkiye, positioned between Europe and Asia, offers suitable opportunities for this expansion. Among the methods foreign companies use to establish a foothold but not a company in...
In joint stock companies, the body in charge of managing and representing the company is the board of directors. The members of the board of directors are liable to the company for the damages caused by their negligence in the performance of their duties...
Sales contracts are the most common and most important contracts of commercial life . Determining the rights and obligations of the parties as a result of the defects encountered in the goods subject to the sale is one of the most common legal problems in commercial sales...
Under Article 365 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC"), each member of the board of directors, which is the body responsible for the administration and representation of a joint stock company, is obliged to fulfill their duties arising from the law and the articles of association within the limits...
Law No. 7262 dated 27.12.2020 introduced an obligation to notify the Central Registry Agency (“CRA”) regarding the issuance and transfer of bearer shares under the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”) and stipulates that those who violate the notification requirement under Art. 486/2 of the TCC shall be...
Similar to previous years, in 2024, mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) transactions continue to be shaped by global economic dynamics, geopolitical risks and technological innovations...
The common goal (in the ideal world) of people who become shareholders by participating in the capital of a company or managers by participating in the management body is to manage the company in the best way and to obtain maximum economic benefit...
The most common forms of agency agreements can be categorized under three main headings. These can be listed as an Agency Agreement, Distributorship Agreement, and Franchise Agreement...
Employee shareholding, which means the ownership of some or all of the capital of a publicly traded or closed company by employees, has attracted great interest in many countries around the world, particularly in the United States of America, due to the advantages it provides to the national economy, the...
There are many different rules that newly established companies must consider and comply with when starting their commercial activities. One of these rules is the "Evasion of Law" article regulated under Article 356 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC"). The relevant rule aims to prevent the...
The Turkish automobile and light commercial vehicle market left the 2000s behind with steadily rising sales figures and the 2010s with high and stable sales figures as well. In this period, the growth of the market was driven not only by high purchase power but also by easy access to credit and product diversity...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") provides the right to exit from the company to the shareholders of limited liability companies and the right to squeeze out the shareholder from the company, unlike the structure of joint stock companies, with the exit and squeeze out institutions specially regulated for...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”) preserves the rule that the board of directors shall manage and represent joint stock companies. The TCC regulates how the power of representation shall be exercised, the registration and announcement of the persons authorized to represent, the transfer of the...
Merger and acquisition processes are one of the legal processes that most seriously affect the identities and legal status of companies. After the completion of legal, tax, financial and operational due diligence reports, the parties initiate the negotiation process in case they reach an agreement on proceeding with the...
A popular business model for expanding market reach and brand recognition worldwide is franchising. Despite being less common than distribution agreements in the form of mono-brand store agreements, franchising is another significant method for extending luxury brands' distribution networks. Luxury brands use...
In the decision dated 14.06.2022 and numbered 2019/149 E. 2022/894 K., the Court of Cassation General Assembly (“CCGA”) evaluated the theory of piercing the corporate veil in the context of the relationship between the guarantor and the borrowing company in a dispute arising from a loan agreement...
The European Union continues to be an important investment center for foreign investors. According to data from the European Commission's "Second Annual Report on the monitoring of foreign direct investment in the European Union", the European Union received €117 billion worth of foreign direct investment in...
Transfer of shares is arguably the first legal transaction that comes to mind among the legal transactions regarding the shares of a capital company, and the most common transaction in practice. However, the shares of a capital company may also be subject to various transactions, other than share purchase...
Law No. 6563 on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce (E-commerce Law or Law) has recently undergone a radical change in order to regulate the behavior of the players in the rapidly growing and developing e-commerce sector. The new regulations that came into force as of January 1, 2023 envisage important...
On 11 June 2021, the German Federal Parliament approved the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltsgesetz) (“Act”) which affects not only German entities but also their suppliers in foreign countries (including Turkish entities). The main focus of the Act, which entered into force on...
On 21 December 2007, the Federal Council approved the draft revision of the Swiss Code of Obligations, which also includes amendments to company law. On 28 November 2014, the Federal Council referred the draft revision for consultation. Following extensive discussions and a long enactment process, the...
The Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") regulates maritime trade contracts under the fourth part of the fifth book of the Code. Among the types of contracts regulated in this section, the most frequently used contract in international maritime transport practice is the freight contract regulated under...
Prohibition on hidden income shifting is one of the most important issues that is broadly regulated under Capital Markets Law No. 6362 (“CML”). In conjunction with CML Article 21, which has a broader context than Article 15 of the abrogated Capital Markets Law No. 2499, another significant step has been taken...
As a result of developing commercial activities and large-scale investments, especially concluded in the fields of construction, energy and mining, companies are seeking to participate in these investments by uniting their powers and expertise to take advantage of financial opportunities together. This tendency...
The Turkish Commercial Code (“TCC” or “Law”) has enabled companies to apply different structural models and to implement new legal formations by including spin-off provisions to its Article 159 et seq. In accordance with the provisions of the law, companies may transfer a certain element, or elements, of their...
The International Federation of Consulting Engineers is a professional association established in 1913, known as the FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Counseils). Its members are duly elected from consultant-engineer associations of various countries, and membership to the association is...
Incoterms are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of Incoterms rules is to facilitate and expedite international trade in a safe and secure manner...
The regulation applicable to all Turkish ports prepared by the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications that entered into force after being published in the official gazette on October 31, 2012 (˝the Regulation˝), consolidates all the bylaws, regulations and instructions in a single Regulation...
As a rule, rights and obligations arising from an agreement have legal consequences only between the creditor and the debtor which are parties to the agreement. This principle is referred to as "privity of contract." In general, contracts for the benefit of third parties, where the fulfillment of an...
The rules of e-commerce, which grow and develop with the digitalizing world, are changing. E-commerce has become the driving force of the digital economy. However, considering the growth rate of e-commerce and the transformation it has undergone in a short time, it is obvious that some...
The dissolution of a company is a specific type of dissolution, which results in the cancellation of the legal personality which was gained by registration at incorporation. The specific proceeding which leads to the dissolution, and thus, the termination of a company upon the constitutive decision...
Companies in which shares or authority to manage is held by members of a family are considered to be “family businesses”. Family members can hold shares that control the company, as well as retain management authority. Having a family business means opportunity, security and income for...
Turkey ratified the Convention on the Contract for International Carriage of Goods by Road (“CMR”) in accordance with Act No. 3939 dated 7 December 1993, and the CMR entered into force in Turkey on 31 October 1995. In accordance with Article 1 / 1 of the CMR, the carriage of goods by road...
Ordinary partnerships are governed by Article 620 et seq. of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO”). An ordinary partnership agreement is defined as an agreement whereby two or more persons undertake to join efforts and/or goods to reach a common goal...
The concept of disguised profit transfer in joint stock companies, in its broadest meaning, covers the transfer of company assets to related parties and may occur in different ways. This concept is regulated in detail under capital markets legislation...
Share subscription agreements, which are commonly encountered in start-up investments, set out the terms and conditions of an investor’s participation in a company as a shareholder by subscribing the new shares issued in a capital increase...
The electronic signature, which has the same legal consequences as wet signatures if it meets certain conditions, has taken its place in many legal systems and has enhanced commercial life. Although there are various types and applications in different legal systems...
INCOTERMS are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of the Incoterms rules is to contribute to and facilitate the safe and swift conduct of international trade...