NEWSLETTER-2019-metin

345 SPORTS LAW Conclusion The reasons that parties prefer to apply to sporting jurisdiction and arbitration for the settlement of disputes concerning Football Con- tracts instead of civil jurisdiction are that there is a uniform system in place, and the disputes are handled by expert individuals in the foot- ball arena and in football law, within a short period of time, and the decisions are final, expeditious and executory. Within this regard, as it is stated in the reasons of the Decision of the CC that when arbitration is considered as an alternative dispute resolution system, the regulation making the DRC a voluntary arbitra- tion, based on the will of the Parties in the settlement of the disputes arising from Football Contracts, is suitable. Concerning the disputes of sporting penalties and training com- pensation, the DRC acts as mandatory arbitration as it had in the previ- ous period between 2011 and 2015. With this provision, the uniformed system has been retained regarding the before-mentioned matters that are exclusive to sports law.